Written by Thorny Rose via Elaine Charkowski on Facebook. It's an incredibly powerful piece on male violence.
I posted a similar post somewhere else and I was actually banned for talking about this. But honestly I don't really care if I am banned from a million of groups even though I really loved that one... The truth must be faced and the word about it must be spread. We have reached the point when we no longer have time to negotiate. We all LIVE in an emergency situation right now. And it is my strong belief that only human females have it in their (our) power to prevent the irreversible disaster, the complete extermination of life (naturally including ourselves and our children, not just boys but ALL our children) on this beautiful planet by males and their system.
The important and indisputable fact to face is that males DO have a genetic predisposition for aggression, competitiveness, violence and possessiveness. Why? Because the very survival of the male organism is in some circumstances dependent on it. We may or may not recognize ourselves as animals but we cannot argue the fact that we are all susceptible to biological drives. While women's bodies represent a complete and wholesome organism with full life-creating equipment AND even the potential for parthenogenesis, male's specific set of genes deprives them of all of these traits altogether:
First and foremost they do not possess and cannot produce eggs. This question in itself should be examined at length because we are made to believe that a female egg and a male's spermatozoon are comparable equivalents of female and male genetic material. Nothing could be further from the truth. The female egg is about 85000 (eighty five thousand!) times bigger than a male's spermatozoon, besides containing genetic material it (the egg) also has many different kinds of organelles which enable its nutrition, growth and development. Finally, a female's egg has a potential for parthenogenesis which males' spermatozoa simply cannot have under ANY circumstances.
Womb. Males do not have it. Without it they canNOT create life despite all their wet delusions about male-gods and their "life-giving powers".
Female breast. As soon as a new life is created it needs specific nutrition. We are mammals. Males have breasts (because essentially and biologically they are nothing other than mutated females) but their breasts canNOT produce milk and ensure the survival of newly created life.
Just thinking about this, it may be quite a sad lot. And being surrounded by the creatures which actually DO possess all these traits makes a very fertile ground for the deepest imaginable inferiority complex. Hence misogyny for the sake of misogyny. Hence wishful creation of male divinities which "give life" in some myths by masturbation, in some by axing the head (Zeus) and delivering new life this way, in some by "immaculate conception". The truth is that the so-called immaculate conception IS possible. It actually DOES happen in nature. But NEVER it is the property of males. It is ONLY female who can create life ALL BY HERSELF.
In view of all this, a male MUST be exceptionally strong psychologically (and I do mean exceptionally) and must have a strong matriarchal influence which might (and only might, without any guarantees no matter how hard you try) potentially MITIGATE HIS NATURAL PREDISPOSITIONS. In the vast majority of cases it is no more than wishful thinking on our part. Because they are our babies, our creations, we also have a natural propensity to remain in denial about what they represent biologically and even in full view of the consequences of the patriarchal mind-set of the world we tend to take at least part of these consequences upon ourselves.
In at least 90% of the cases little boys simply grow into males who OPENLY OR SECRETLY ACCEPT, SUPPORT AND REINFORCE PATRIARCHY, THE SYSTEM THAT TOOK ORIGIN IN THEIR NATURAL INCLINATIONS AND PROPENSITIES AND WHICH PERPETUATES THEIR MOST BASIC BIOLOGICAL TENDENCIES.
The survival of the genes of the male organism is completely and absolutely dependent on whether or not they will be able to get access to a female, enter her body and whether the cells carrying their genes will be able to reach the female's egg and basically invade it, the process which is very similar to the way viruses act. So, if you look at it from a purely biological point of view you might very well and quite confidently say that they are NATURAL RAPISTS.
Males of different species have been following different paths. Peacocks for example. Instead of developing the dumb bulk of muscles that enables human males to fight each other in competition for a female and eventually use those muscles to SUBJUGATE AND CONTROL the female herself, peacocks developed stunningly gorgeous, magnificent, totally awesome in their beauty, tails. Peahens (and females of many other bird species) are very sensitive to beautiful males' tails because on a conscious or subconscious level it signifies a male's health and tell the female that this male is a good potential father for her offspring. Frog males sing, frog females listen. The best singers are the most attractive and desirable sex partners. Human males developed muscles. Which allows them to be violent and oppressive, which enables them to be better rapists, killers and exploiters of all kinds. Which enabled them to create and maintain such a profoundly sick and insane system as patriarchy.
Yes, they do have a choice but collectively they ARE NOT ABLE to make the right choice because of their specific male nature. Once again the proof is all around us. The proof is millennia old. It is OBVIOUS in the most literal of senses, on the global scale and under the microscope. Still the majority of us keep denying it perpetuating our own imprisonment in the trap that we create ourselves, until nothing is left, no life and not even hope.
I posted a similar post somewhere else and I was actually banned for talking about this. But honestly I don't really care if I am banned from a million of groups even though I really loved that one... The truth must be faced and the word about it must be spread. We have reached the point when we no longer have time to negotiate. We all LIVE in an emergency situation right now. And it is my strong belief that only human females have it in their (our) power to prevent the irreversible disaster, the complete extermination of life (naturally including ourselves and our children, not just boys but ALL our children) on this beautiful planet by males and their system.
The important and indisputable fact to face is that males DO have a genetic predisposition for aggression, competitiveness, violence and possessiveness. Why? Because the very survival of the male organism is in some circumstances dependent on it. We may or may not recognize ourselves as animals but we cannot argue the fact that we are all susceptible to biological drives. While women's bodies represent a complete and wholesome organism with full life-creating equipment AND even the potential for parthenogenesis, male's specific set of genes deprives them of all of these traits altogether:
First and foremost they do not possess and cannot produce eggs. This question in itself should be examined at length because we are made to believe that a female egg and a male's spermatozoon are comparable equivalents of female and male genetic material. Nothing could be further from the truth. The female egg is about 85000 (eighty five thousand!) times bigger than a male's spermatozoon, besides containing genetic material it (the egg) also has many different kinds of organelles which enable its nutrition, growth and development. Finally, a female's egg has a potential for parthenogenesis which males' spermatozoa simply cannot have under ANY circumstances.
Womb. Males do not have it. Without it they canNOT create life despite all their wet delusions about male-gods and their "life-giving powers".
Female breast. As soon as a new life is created it needs specific nutrition. We are mammals. Males have breasts (because essentially and biologically they are nothing other than mutated females) but their breasts canNOT produce milk and ensure the survival of newly created life.
Just thinking about this, it may be quite a sad lot. And being surrounded by the creatures which actually DO possess all these traits makes a very fertile ground for the deepest imaginable inferiority complex. Hence misogyny for the sake of misogyny. Hence wishful creation of male divinities which "give life" in some myths by masturbation, in some by axing the head (Zeus) and delivering new life this way, in some by "immaculate conception". The truth is that the so-called immaculate conception IS possible. It actually DOES happen in nature. But NEVER it is the property of males. It is ONLY female who can create life ALL BY HERSELF.
In view of all this, a male MUST be exceptionally strong psychologically (and I do mean exceptionally) and must have a strong matriarchal influence which might (and only might, without any guarantees no matter how hard you try) potentially MITIGATE HIS NATURAL PREDISPOSITIONS. In the vast majority of cases it is no more than wishful thinking on our part. Because they are our babies, our creations, we also have a natural propensity to remain in denial about what they represent biologically and even in full view of the consequences of the patriarchal mind-set of the world we tend to take at least part of these consequences upon ourselves.
In at least 90% of the cases little boys simply grow into males who OPENLY OR SECRETLY ACCEPT, SUPPORT AND REINFORCE PATRIARCHY, THE SYSTEM THAT TOOK ORIGIN IN THEIR NATURAL INCLINATIONS AND PROPENSITIES AND WHICH PERPETUATES THEIR MOST BASIC BIOLOGICAL TENDENCIES.
The survival of the genes of the male organism is completely and absolutely dependent on whether or not they will be able to get access to a female, enter her body and whether the cells carrying their genes will be able to reach the female's egg and basically invade it, the process which is very similar to the way viruses act. So, if you look at it from a purely biological point of view you might very well and quite confidently say that they are NATURAL RAPISTS.
Males of different species have been following different paths. Peacocks for example. Instead of developing the dumb bulk of muscles that enables human males to fight each other in competition for a female and eventually use those muscles to SUBJUGATE AND CONTROL the female herself, peacocks developed stunningly gorgeous, magnificent, totally awesome in their beauty, tails. Peahens (and females of many other bird species) are very sensitive to beautiful males' tails because on a conscious or subconscious level it signifies a male's health and tell the female that this male is a good potential father for her offspring. Frog males sing, frog females listen. The best singers are the most attractive and desirable sex partners. Human males developed muscles. Which allows them to be violent and oppressive, which enables them to be better rapists, killers and exploiters of all kinds. Which enabled them to create and maintain such a profoundly sick and insane system as patriarchy.
Yes, they do have a choice but collectively they ARE NOT ABLE to make the right choice because of their specific male nature. Once again the proof is all around us. The proof is millennia old. It is OBVIOUS in the most literal of senses, on the global scale and under the microscope. Still the majority of us keep denying it perpetuating our own imprisonment in the trap that we create ourselves, until nothing is left, no life and not even hope.
0 comments:
Post a Comment